By Alexander Luyima | Diaspora Political Correspondent, Hoima Post
TORONTO – The electric atmosphere at last weekend’s NUP Canada Convention 2025 turned reflective during the press conference, as Bobi Wine Uganda’s fiery opposition leader was pressed to move beyond poetic vision and articulate practical governance plans. The moment revealed both the enduring appeal and the emerging challenges facing Uganda’s opposition movement as it eyes the 2026 elections.
When a Canadian journalist asked for specifics on “governance models and democratic structures,” Kyagulanyi responded not with policy bullet points, but with vivid imagery of “fertile lands” and “Africa’s youngest population.” The diaspora audience erupted in applause, while some foreign observers exchanged knowing glances. This tension between inspirational rhetoric and governing substance is becoming the defining paradox of the National Unity Platform (NUP).
The Diaspora Dilemma
For the thousands of Ugandan exiles in attendance many of whom fled political persecution Bobi Wine’s words carried deep emotional weight.
“He’s speaking to our trauma,” said Nathan Bwerenga, a Toronto-based activist originally from Luwero. “When you’ve seen relatives disappeared by the regime, you don’t need policy manuals you need to believe that change is possible.”
Yet this emotional connection often obscures growing concerns about NUP’s preparedness for governance. While the convention’s public sessions emphasized liberation rhetoric, private meetings with potential donors reportedly turned to more difficult conversations:
Economic Plans: How will NUP address Uganda’s 62% informal employment rate?
Institutional Reform: What are the specifics for depoliticizing the military and civil service?
Transition Framework: What constitutional mechanisms will ensure a peaceful transfer of power?
The Policy Vacuum
Dr. Sylvia Nalubega, a political scientist at the University of Toronto, noted that such dynamics are common among liberation movements.
“The ANC also struggled with the transition from freedom fighters to administrators,” she told Hoima Post. “But Uganda’s context is different, you’re dealing with a militarized state and an opposition that has never governed.”
NUP’s 2024 manifesto outlines broad principles but lacks operational detail. For example, while it promises universal healthcare, it does not explain how this would be funded in a country where 40% of the health budget currently comes from donors. Similarly, the proposed agricultural reforms fail to address specific issues in areas like Hoima, where oil development continues to spark land conflicts with subsistence farmers.
The Road to 2026
As the convention concluded, two contrasting narratives emerged. The diaspora faithful left inspired by Bobi Wine’s unbroken spirit.
“He’s keeping the flame alive,” said Rose Nyakato, a Kampala-born nurse based in Ottawa.
Meanwhile, policy professionals quietly voiced concerns about whether inspiration alone can dismantle Museveni’s 40-year regime.
The months ahead will be critical as NUP attempts to bridge this gap. With donor patience wearing thin and the 2026 elections approaching, the movement must prove it can transform protest energy into governing competence especially in regions like Hoima, where oil politics further complicate opposition messaging.
For now, the Toronto convention confirmed one enduring truth: Bobi Wine remains Uganda’s most potent symbol of change. But as one European diplomat privately remarked,
“Poetry wins protests. Prose wins elections.”
Alexander Luyima covers diaspora politics for Hoima Post, with a focus on Uganda’s opposition movements.
Follow him on Twitter: @alexanderluyim
The Hoima Post – Trustable News 24 -7