Government Selective Demolitions in Lubigi Wetland Leads to internal Displacement and Uncertainty for Residents.

By Wabusimba Amiri.

Recently, the Ugandan government, through the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA), launched an aggressive campaign to dismantle buildings in wetlands. This initiative, intended to conserve the country’s dwindling wetlands, has ignited a contentious debate among citizens and policymakers about balancing environmental conservation with urban development. As a student of diplomacy, environmentalist, and human rights advocate, I am deeply concerned with both the ecological health of our nation and the socio-economic welfare of our people. This dual commitment compels me to address the intricacies of the government’s recent measures and their broader implications for Uganda’s future.

Uganda’s wetlands are vital ecosystems that provide essential services such as water purification, flood mitigation, and habitats for various species. Their degradation has severe repercussions, endangering biodiversity, water quality, and climate resilience. The urgency to protect these areas is undeniable. However, NEMA’s current approach raises significant humanitarian concerns that need thorough scrutiny. Historically, many investments in Uganda have been made in wetlands, supported by government policies and approvals. Investors received land titles and building permits, legitimizing their developments. As a result, these areas have become economic hubs, significantly contributing to our GDP and creating jobs. The recent demolitions have thus shocked many who believed their investments were secure and government-endorsed.

The situation in Lubigi, one of Kampala’s largest wetlands, highlights the controversy. NEMA’s recent demolitions destroyed numerous buildings, sparing only a newly constructed petrol station. Long-term residents are now dealing with the loss of their homes and businesses. The selective nature of these demolitions raises questions about fairness and transparency in enforcing environmental regulations. Beyond the environmental and economic aspects, the humanitarian impact is severe. Families have been displaced, livelihoods disrupted, and communities fractured, leaving people homeless in their own country. This approach disregards fundamental human rights to shelter, security, and stable livelihoods, creating more internally displaced people.

The government’s actions have understandably left many citizens puzzled and disheartened. While there is a pressing need to conserve our wetlands for long-term environmental sustainability, the abrupt and seemingly arbitrary demolition of properties has disrupted lives and livelihoods, leading to social and economic instability. To address this complex issue, Uganda must adopt a more balanced and strategic approach. Environmental conservation and urban development should not be mutually exclusive. A comprehensive planning process must involve all stakeholders, including landowners, investors, and local communities. Meaningful dialogue and engagement are essential to develop solutions that are both ecologically sound and socially equitable.

The government should provide clear, consistent, and transparent guidelines on land use and development in wetland areas to prevent future conflicts and ensure that all parties understand their rights and responsibilities. Selective demolition practices erode public trust and undermine the credibility of conservation efforts. All stakeholders, regardless of their economic or political influence, must be held to the same standards to ensure fairness and accountability.

Furthermore, the government should offer support and compensation to those affected by the demolitions, including financial assistance, relocation options, and opportunities for alternative livelihoods to mitigate the social and economic impact. Encouraging sustainable development practices that harmonize environmental conservation with economic growth is crucial, promoting eco-friendly construction methods, green infrastructure, and investment in renewable energy sources.

Protecting Uganda’s wetlands is a critical and urgent task that must be pursued with a nuanced and balanced approach. By fostering collaboration, transparency, and fairness, we can achieve a sustainable equilibrium between environmental conservation and economic development. As we move forward, let us remember that true progress lies in harmonizing our developmental aspirations with the imperative of preserving our natural heritage for future generations. Only through such a comprehensive approach can we secure a prosperous and sustainable future for all Ugandans.