Parliament Dress Code Controversy: A Misguided Attack on Cultural Identity

The proposed regulation to ban traditional attire like the kanzu and gomesi in Uganda’s Parliament raises serious questions about cultural identity, inclusivity and priorities in governance.

Is It Really Necessary?

Uganda, like many African nations, takes pride in its cultural diversity. The kanzu and gomesi are not just clothing; they are symbols of heritage worn by multiple tribes beyond just the Baganda. Many parliaments worldwide allow culturally appropriate dress, recognizing the importance of representation. If professionalism is the concern, why not define acceptable versions of traditional attire rather than banning them altogether?

The Motive Behind This Move

With Uganda facing pressing issues like poverty, corruption, poor healthcare, and unemployment, prioritizing a dress code change seems misplaced. One could argue that this is a distraction from more urgent national matters. If this move comes from Speaker Anita Among and is backed by President Museveni’s administration, some may see it as part of a broader political agenda rather than a genuine concern for professionalism.

Is This an Attack on African Culture?

Banning traditional wear in a predominantly African country raises fears of cultural erosion. African attire is widely accepted even in formal global settings. Countries like Nigeria, Ghana, and Kenya embrace their traditional dress codes in official functions, including Parliament. Why, then, should Uganda move in the opposite direction? Given the Speaker’s known political leanings, some may view this as an attack on certain cultural identities under the pretext of standardizing professionalism.

My Opinion

This move is unnecessary and misplaced. Instead of focusing on attire, Parliament should address real national concerns. If the aim is professionalism, a more inclusive dress code policy that respects Uganda’s diverse cultures should be considered. If the intention is political or personal, it could backfire by alienating communities that value these cultural symbols. Uganda’s leaders should be promoting national unity, not making divisive decisions over what MPs wear.