Connect with us

Entertainment

Chanel Thierry Expresses Frustration Over Mustard’s Alleged Refusal to Allow Holiday Visitation with Their Kids

Published

on

Spread the love

Tensions between Mustard and his ex-wife Chanel Thierry are escalating amid their divorce, with Thierry recently venting her frustrations on Threads. In her public expression, she accused the producer of rejecting her request to spend time with their three children during the holidays, attributing his actions to jealousy, control, bitterness, and more. Thierry asserted that Mustard is preventing her from seeing their kids out of spite.

In her social media post, she stated, “Imagine not allowing a mother to see her kids on Christmas for the second year in a row is NASTY WORK,” emphasizing the emotional toll of being separated from her children during a festive season. She continued, “Especially after they already expected to see her. Some of these men are more bitter than they appear. A true [clown emoji]. Bitter at this point is an understatement.”

Bank of Uganda Grants License to Armada Credit Bureau Limited, Marking the Fourth Credit Bureau in the Country

Thierry also suggested a connection between Mustard’s actions and a TikTok incident, describing it as his attempt to exert control and inflict punishment. She criticized what she perceives as jealousy, stating, “A jealous BD [baby daddy] ain’t nothing to underestimate.”

This recent outburst follows a legal development in October when Mustard accused Thierry of attempting to unlawfully obtain his financial information and demanded $10,000 from her. He claimed that she issued subpoenas to his former employers seeking irrelevant documents in an effort to prolong the divorce proceedings and gather information for a higher child support claim.

The ongoing legal battle and public exchanges highlight the challenges and complexities of divorce, especially when it involves high-profile individuals. Thierry’s claims about Mustard’s refusal to allow holiday visitation further fuel the public discourse surrounding their tumultuous relationship.

See also  Dreezy and Deiondra Sanders' Twitter Feud Sparks Controversy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74t82sHTlEU

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

Nardo Wick Faces Criticism on “50 Women vs 1 Rapper” for Sobriety Stance

Published

on

Spread the love

Nardo Wick recently made an appearance on the popular YouTube series “50 Women vs 1 Rapper,” where he found himself under scrutiny for his stance on sobriety. During the show, which features women interviewing rappers as potential partners and voting on their compatibility, Wick was labeled as “boring” by one of the participants due to his refusal to indulge in alcohol or drugs.

In a revealing moment, a woman dressed in white questioned Wick about his drinking habits, to which he responded that he rarely drinks, especially not during events or hostings. This prompted the woman to dismiss him as a “boring” individual, expressing a preference for someone more inclined towards substance use for fun.

Wick defended his stance, asserting that one doesn’t need drugs or alcohol to enjoy oneself. This exchange highlighted the contrast between Wick’s sober lifestyle and societal expectations within certain circles of the entertainment industry.

This is not the first time Wick has openly discussed his sobriety. In a previous interview on the Off The Record podcast with DJ Akademiks in 2022, Wick shared his experiences growing up around drugs and how it influenced his decision to stay sober. Despite facing criticism, Wick remained steadfast in his convictions.

Ultimately, Wick’s appearance on “50 Women vs 1 Rapper” sheds light on the diversity of perspectives within the hip-hop community and challenges conventional norms surrounding substance use in the industry. Watch the full segment to witness Wick’s candid discussion on sobriety and personal values.

See also  Dreezy and Deiondra Sanders' Twitter Feud Sparks Controversy
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Guilty Verdict: Two Men Convicted of Jam Master Jay Murder

Published

on

Spread the love

After nearly two decades since the tragic killing of hip-hop legend Jam Master Jay, justice has finally been served. A jury has found Karl Jordan Jr. and Ronald Washington guilty of murder in connection with Jay’s death at a recording studio in 2002. The verdict mandates a minimum of 20 years behind bars and could extend to life imprisonment for the convicted individuals.

According to prosecutors, the motive behind Jay’s murder stemmed from a drug deal gone awry. Allegedly, Jay had acquired a significant amount of cocaine intended for distribution, with Washington and Jordan among the intended recipients. However, tensions escalated when Jay purportedly decided to exclude Washington from the deal, prompting a deadly retaliation plan.

On the night of October 30, 2002, Washington and Jordan reportedly stormed the recording studio, brandishing firearms and demanding Jay to lie on the floor. Subsequently, Jordan fatally shot Jay at close range, ending the life of the revered hip-hop figure.

During the trial, a witness present at the studio that fateful night corroborated the prosecution’s account, revealing fear and confusion that had previously prevented them from disclosing the identities of the assailants. Assistant US Attorney Artie McConnell emphasized the role of greed, money, and jealousy in driving the heinous act.

In their defense, Washington and Jordan attempted to shift blame onto another individual, Jay Bryant, whom they claimed was the actual perpetrator. Bryant is scheduled to face trial separately in 2026.

Upon hearing the guilty verdict, the courtroom reportedly erupted into chaos, with Washington vehemently protesting and claiming innocence. The resolution of this long-standing case brings closure to Jay’s family, friends, and the hip-hop community at large, while underscoring the enduring impact of his legacy. Stay tuned for further developments on Jam Master Jay’s case.

See also  Dreezy and Deiondra Sanders' Twitter Feud Sparks Controversy
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Kanye West Faces Lawsuit Over Unauthorized Sample in Vultures 1 Album

Published

on

Spread the love

Kanye West’s recent joint project with Ty Dolla $ign, Vultures 1, made waves upon its release earlier this month. However, the album has now become the subject of a legal battle for West. The estate of Donna Summer has filed a lawsuit against him over the unauthorized use of her single, “I Feel Love,” which he sampled on the Vultures 1 track, “GOOD (DON’T DIE),” without proper authorization.

Despite its brief presence on the album before being removed days after release, “GOOD (DON’T DIE)” quickly became a standout track. However, Summer’s estate asserts that West attempted to use a soundalike to interpolate her song after being denied permission to sample “I Feel Love.” The estate maintains that this interpolation does not shield West from copyright infringement.

The decision by Summer’s estate to deny West permission likely stems from the controversies surrounding him, including his remarks on George Floyd and pro-Hitler statements. Despite West’s offer, the estate deemed it unfitting to allow the use of Summer’s song.

Following the lawsuit, streaming platforms removed “GOOD (DON’T DIE)” from their catalogs in certain markets. However, the song has since returned to some platforms, accruing millions of streams. Moreover, it remains available for those who purchased the album on platforms like Apple Music.

The estate of Donna Summer seeks significant damages and an injunction to prevent further distribution of the song.

See also  Dame Dash Faces Renewed Lawsuit from Photographer Monique Bunn Over Alleged Financial Losses
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Druski Raises Eyebrows by Skipping Next Year’s Super Bowl

Published

on

Spread the love

During a recent appearance on the Million Dollaz Worth Of Game podcast, Druski engaged in a candid conversation with hosts Gillie and Wallo, covering various topics, including next year’s Super Bowl. Set to take place in New Orleans, the hosts were curious if Druski had plans to attend. However, Druski surprised them with his response, revealing that he had no intention of attending due to potential encounters with certain artists, notably Birdman, among others.

Gillie and Wallo expressed surprise at Druski’s decision, pressing him for more details and seemingly questioning the validity of his concerns. However, Druski stood firm in his stance, leading some fans to speculate whether his remarks were part of an elaborate joke. Comments on the post ranged from amusement to genuine concern, with some questioning the authenticity of Druski’s apprehension.

The Super Bowl is renowned for its star-studded guest list, and this year was no exception. With performances by Usher, Alicia Keys, Lil Jon, Ludacris, and others during the halftime show, and appearances by Travis Scott, Lil Baby, Cardi B, and more at the annual Fanatics party, the event drew a plethora of high-profile celebrities.

Druski’s decision to skip the Super Bowl has sparked curiosity and debate among fans. Whether his concerns are genuine or part of a comedic act remains to be seen, but his comments have certainly piqued interest in his future plans.

See also  T.I. Receives Phoenix Award in Atlanta for Philanthropy and Entertainment Contributions
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 20123