Taylor Swift Threatens Legal Action Against Student Tracking Her Private Jet

Taylor Swift, the renowned pop star, is taking legal action against a college student for tracking her private jet and its carbon footprint. Swift’s lawyers have issued a cease and desist letter to 21-year-old Jack Sweeney, a student at the University of Central Florida, who has been monitoring the movements of Swift’s private aircraft.

For years, Sweeney has been tracking the takeoffs and landings of various private jets, including those owned by politicians, Russian oligarchs, and billionaires like Elon Musk. However, Swift’s jet is one of the aircraft that Sweeney has been monitoring closely.

Swift’s legal team has demanded that Sweeney cease sharing the location of her private jet. The letter sent to Sweeney emphasizes the seriousness of the matter, stating that while Sweeney may view it as a game or a means to gain wealth or fame, it poses a significant risk to Swift’s safety. The lawyers accuse Sweeney of engaging in stalking and harassing behavior, arguing that there is no legitimate public interest or need for this information.

The letter also highlights past instances of stalking against Swift, including a recent incident where a man was arrested outside her New York townhouse. Swift’s spokespersons suggest a connection between these incidents and Sweeney’s tracking activities.

Additionally, Swift’s legal team refutes criticisms of her carbon footprint, noting that she often lends her private jet to others for use. They argue that the scrutiny she faces regarding her carbon emissions is inaccurate.

Sweeney has dismissed the letter from Swift’s legal team as a scare tactic, particularly following public outcry over the environmental impact of Swift’s private jet use during her ongoing tour. Despite the notice from Swift, Sweeney is unlikely to halt his tracking activities.

While celebrities may be angered by Sweeney’s actions, he has garnered praise for his work, earning him a spot in Forbes’ 30 Under 30 list. The ongoing dispute raises questions about the balance between privacy rights and freedom of speech, and whether it will ultimately be resolved in a courtroom remains to be seen.